Holies Crisps is a Private Limited Company and so has limited liability and is not on the stock market. It also has greater sources of finance, including the private sales of shares.

HCL has a growing reputation which means it is gaining market share in an existing market. The company is 5 years old. HCL produces a range of ‘top-quality hand-fried’ products. The business supplies over 6000 independent retailers such as high class stores, farm shops, health food shops, delicatessens and ‘gastro pubs’. HCL products are sold in top-end retailers so this helps to support and develop brand image because retailers will add their own mark-ups to cover their own costs and make profit. Loyal customers of these retailers will become loyal customers of HCL through association and familiarity should they shop elsewhere. The products go direct from HCL to retailers to customers; this is quite a short distribution channel and so not only gives HCL more control, but reduces costs of transportation and large support departments and relation with intermediaries. Richard owns 80% of the business, the rest is owned by a private equity firm. Richard used venture capital to start. Richard borrowed money from the bank to start and experienced a 70% revenue growth in the second year.

Richard carried out market research before he started which means HCL is a market-orientated business. He could have used sales data for this. HCL’s competitive advantage is that it can offer things different from its competitors, and its USP is that its crisps are hand made and unique.  HCL can perform market research through its sales data.

HCL’s Corporate Goals are:

  1. Growth (Increase capacity [new factory])

HCL’s Marketing Objectives are:

  1. Develop new products.

The farm had been a major potato grower for supermarkets but as Richard is now using the potatoes to produce crisps, he will not be supplying as much, if any at all. Richard has past experience with supermarkets and they nearly finished him as a potato farmer and may eb another reason he doesn’t want to trade with them. HCL transports goods or pays for them to be transported to retailers (“It supplies” line 3).

HCL produces 10 different flavours of potato crisps. HCL operates in the ‘better for you’ niche and has 10% of this growing niche. HCL has a 0.5% market share with 9 billion of crisps packets sold annually in the UK.

HCL Market Share

9 billion packets sold nationally in a year. HCL has 0.5% of these sales:

0.5 x 9 000 000 000 = 45 000 000 (45 Million).
60 million people in UK.
45 million ÷ 60 million = 0.75 per person. (or 15 million people who don’t have one packet of HCL crisps per year).

 

 

HCL farms 900 acres but h grows 250 acres of quality potatoes but with low yields and so still has to buy raw materials in. The raw materials will be everything except potatoes because Richard is a potato farmer. HCL might consider growing reduced quality potatoes with greater yields. The potatoes grow on the farm next to the factory meaning delivery is immediate and HCL operates a JIT system because of the proximity of the farm.

HCL has small production runs of 60kg adding value by batch production.

 

Production Process

When frying the crisps, they are stirred once with hand held paddles; this can be eliminated to speed up the production, reduce human labour costs and free hands for other jobs. Burnt or clumped crisps are removed by hand (could be set up as a new differentiated product or sold at discount prices; could also be crushed for powdered crisps -> innovation->lean production). HCL operates a 9 Stage production process.

 

HCL has no clear pricing policy and this may add to the uniqueness and appeal of the products because there is no fixed pattern to pricing that can be identified.

 

De-layer by moving Martin into the executive committee will not only reduce the lines of communication, it will motivate Martin and it means that Martin will be better placed to make decisions because he is more in touch with HCL because of his wide span of control and knows better than anyone else how the business operates. Doing this however, would be contradictory to Richard’s leadership style because Martin would not have to report to him as much and Richard will have less to do with those in Martin’s chain of command. Martin can indirectly make decisions because he reports directly to Richard, he can run suggestions by him, which he may not be able to do if there was someone between Martin and Richard. This is a functional/hierarchical structure. Richard doesn’t feel that the structure needs to be changed as he thinks it will only be required if HCL’s current growth continues for 5 more years. HCL is a centralised organisation because all decisions are made by the executive committee (line 79). Richard wants to keep “in closer touch with the market” as he is very autocratic, he will be helping Sam for the foreseeable future and he is responsible for 29 out of 34 people.

Independent retailer would have left. Most likely because the independent retailer wouldn’t then have a unique product and could not compete with supermarkets. If their retailers had left HCL, this may have resulted in HCL not being able to charge premium prices because supermarkets would want to sell the products much cheaper than independent retailer might. Richard stopped supermarkets selling his products because he wanted to retain the feel of a family business and he could not do so if his products were on mass production for supermarkets.

The supermarkets issue was widely reported giving HCL free promotion. This news however may not please people who want to be able to buy HCL’s products from the supermarkets.

There are 35 people in HCL altogether which classifies HCL as a small business according to the Department of Trade and Industry because they have fewer than 100 employees.

 

Richard expects the non-potato crisp market to grow rapidly and this may be as a result to bad press (line 44-45).

HCL can in response to bad press increase non-potato ranges.

Things that HCL pays for are:

  1. Harvesting
  2. Materials

Second Production Line

  1. Reduced land to grow potatoes on, because he wants to build it on the farm.
  2. He wants to build it because of a recent growth in sales and this may not last.
  3. Increase capacity.

Existing Factory (New system?)

  1. Opportunity costs are: Can’t get more quality control staff, number of new products that can be launched.
  2. Loyal employees will feel Job Insecurity with new system, if their job is safe or if it will affect their rate of earnings.
  3. Downtime while new system is installed
  4. With the high levels of debt this will bring, payback is not encouraging.

 

 

 

    January 2009 February 2009

Jan – Feb

Product Unit Size Price* (£) Quantity Price* (£) Quantity % change in price % change in demand PED
Potato Crisps
Ready Salted

15 x 200g

22.48

7,100

22.00

7,300

2.4

2.8

1.2

Unflavoured

35 x 50g

20.00

2,200

20.00

2,200

0

0

0

Cheese and Red Onion

35 x 50g

19.20

3,148

19.50

3,200

0

1.7

0

Non-potato crisps
Beetroot

24 x 40g

22.00

748

21.30

761

3.2

1.7

0.5

Parsnip

24 x 40g

21.05

890

20.60

900

2.1

1.1

1.9

Mixed Vegetable

15 x 150g

32.48

1,200

32.48

1,463

0

21.9

0

* Price paid by retailer per box.

    February 2009 March 2009

Feb – March

Product Unit Size Price* (£) Quantity Price* (£) Quantity % change in price % change in demand PED
Potato Crisps
Ready Salted

15 x 200g

22.00

7,300

22.22

7,154

1

2

2

Unflavoured

35 x 50g

20.00

2,200

20.50

2,167

2.5

1.5

0.6

Cheese and Red Onion

35 x 50g

19.50

3,200

20.00

3,305

2.6

3.3

1.3

Non-potato crisps
Beetroot

24 x 40g

21.30

761

20.30

782

4.7

2.8

0.6

Parsnip

24 x 40g

20.60

900

21.63

891

5

1

0.2

Mixed Vegetable

15 x 150g

32.48

1,463

33.50

1,312

3

10.3

3.3

 

    February 2009 March 2009

Jan – March

Product Unit Size Price* (£) Quantity Price* (£) Quantity % change in price % change in demand PED
Potato Crisps
Ready Salted

15 x 200g

22.48

7,100

22.22

7,154

Unflavoured

35 x 50g

20.00

2,200

20.50

2,167

Cheese and Red Onion

35 x 50g

19.20

3,148

20.00

3,305

Non-potato crisps
Beetroot

24 x 40g

22.00

748

20.30

782

Parsnip

24 x 40g

21.05

890

21.63

891

Mixed Vegetable

15 x 150g

32.48

1,200

33.50

1,312

 

 

 

If you are asked to:

 

Plot – this means draw accurately.

 

Sketch – approximately mark the point.

 

Draw – use an appropriate degree of accuracy that the question requires.

 

 

 

The gradient of a line is how slanted it is, the slope of a line. This is usually represented by the letter m.

 

To find the gradient of a line, it is the changes in y, divided by the changes in x. To do this, you’ll need the co-ordinates of two points on the line, but it is the difference between the y co-ordinate values divided by the difference between the x co-ordinate values. This is shown by:

 

M (Gradient) =

Y2-Y1

X2-X1

 

It doesn’t matter which Y co-ordinate you call Y1 or Y2 or which X co-ordinate you call X1 and X2

 

Parallel lines have the same gradient, so if you have two parallel lines, the gradient of the line should be the same as the second one. The gradient of the first line (M1) is equal to the gradient of the second line (M2), M1 = M2.

 

Perpendicular lines are lines which cuts another line at 90 degrees. The gradients of perpendicular lines always multiply to make -1.

 

1
5

 

The reciprocal of a number is whatever that number must be multiplied by to make 1. So the reciprocal of 5 is :

 

 

 

3
2

 

They multiply to make 1. The reciprocal of a fraction is the upside down version of the fraction, so the reciprocal of

 

 

 

is :

 

2
3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If you know the co-ordinates of two points on a line, you can work out the distance between the two points, i.e. the length. If one of the points is called A and another called B, the distance of A to B (AB) is the √(x2-x1)2 + (y2-y1)2.

 

 

 

If you know two points on the line, you can workout the co-ordinates of the mid-point of the line with:

 

x1+x2

 

y1+y2

2

,

2

 

 

 

y-y1 = m(x-x1)a


 

 

There are different methods for solving quadratic equations.

 

  1. 1.      Factorisation:

 

To solve x2 + 5x + 6 = 0 by factorisation:

 

x2 + 5x + 6 = 0 factorised is (x+2)(x+3)=0

 

You know this because x2 is x multiplied by itself. The last terms in each of the brackets must add up to 5 and multiply to give 6.

 

Everything in the bracket is considered as one term, and the brackets are the factors of the equation the came from. So saying (x+2) is a factor of x2 + 5x + 6 = 0 is the same as saying 2 is a factor of 6. Everything in a bracket is treated as one term.

 

So to factorise x2 + 7x + 12 = 0, you know x2 is x multiplied by x. When factorising a quadratic, one of the signs is usually the same as the first sign in the equation, so it’s (x+ )(x+ )=0 so far. In the first bracket, it’s a plus because the first sign in the equation is a plus and you need to work out what is needed to make the second sign in the equation. In this equation, it’s also a plus, so the second sign in the factorisation should be a plus as well. The answer is (x+3)(x+4)=0.

 

So to solve this question, you know that (x+3) and (x+4) are two factors of the equation x2 + 7x + 12 = 0. The equation has 0 on the right hand side and so you know that (x+3) multiplied by (x+4) should equal 0, you also know that anything multiplied by 0 is 0, so one of the factors must equal 0. If (x+3) is equal to zero that means it must be (-3+3)(x+4).

 

X is -3  and -4.

 

Not all quadratics can be factorised, so another method is

 

  1. 2.      Completing the square

 

Some quadratics can be changed to become a perfect square. E.g. x2 – 6x + 2 = 0.

 

Subtract the constant (which is -2) from both sides:
x2 – 6x + 2 = 0
x2 – 6x + 2(-2) = 0 (-2)

 

x2 – 6x  = -2

 

Take the coefficient of x (that’s the -6 in front of x) and halve it: half of -6 is -3.

 

Square -3, this results in 9, add 9 to both sides of x2 – 6x  = -2 and this is:
x2 – 6x+ 9 = 7, factorising gives (x-3)2  = 7. Make sure the right hand side is 0, (x-3)2 – 7  = 0  <- – -   Completed square form.

 

  1. 3.      Quadratic Formula

 

The quadratic formula is  . To use the quadratic formula, you only need to substitute the values, after making sure that the quadratic equation is in the general form of ax + bx + c = 0.


 

The police have powers to arrest anyone that has committed, is in the act of, or they suspect has committed or is about to commit an offence. The powers of arrest were updated by the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (SOCPA) 2005.

The police can arrest a person:

  • To check a person’s name or address
  • To stop the person from:
    • Injuring themselves or another person
    • Being injured by others
    • Causing loss of or damage to property
    • Offending public decency
    • Unlawful obstruction of the highway
    • To protect a child or other venerable person
    • To allow investigation of an offence or the conduct of the arrested person
    • To allow prosecution of the offence and suspect does not disappear

A lawful arrest requires that:

  • The person was involved, suspected of being involved or tried to be involved
  • The person’s arrest is necessary.

The power to arrest can only be used when the officer thinks the arrest is necessary, if reporting for a summons, street bail, issuing a fixed penalty notice or any other action available is more appropriate.

The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 give the police the extra power to arrest anyone who breaches bail conditions.

Police can apply for a warrant to arrest a named person. The arrest warrant allows them to enter and search the suspect’s home so as to make an arrest. An arrest warrant is issued by a magistrate under the Magistrates’ Court Act 1980 and can only be issued with written evidence with evidence on oath to show that the person is suspected of committing an offence.

When the police arrest someone, they must tell them that they are arrested, and why, even if it is obvious. The way in which the officer says it must be understandable in simple, non-technical language to make it a lawful arrest.

 

Detained persons may be questioned by the police. All police interviews must be tape or video recorded. Two copies of the recording is made, one a sealed master copy, the other a working copy, which can be checked by the suspect, lawyers, or police.

Questioning must take place in interview rooms which have to be sufficiently heated and lit. The interviewee must not be made to stand.

Prior to the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, suspects had the right to remain silent without it affecting their defence, but because guilty people were going free using the rule, it was changed so that the fact that they kept silent will also be considered in court.

The courts cannot allow statements which have been obtained as a result of oppression. Oppression includes torture, the use and or threat of violence and inhuman or degrading treatment.

 

These deal with when people are deprived of their liberty by the police. Anyone brought to a police station must be presented to the custody officer as soon as practicable after their arrival. The custody officer must record all events that happen at the police station in relation to that suspect, in a custody record. This includes the time of arrival and the reason there are there.

Under Code C, the police can only detain a person for 24 hours (1 day). If an extension is required, permission can be gained from a senior officer (superintendent or higher); a suspect can then be kept for 12 hours more, totalling 36 hours (1 ½ days). If the suspect in question is not being detained for an indictable offence, they must at this point be released. If it is an indictable offence the detainee is suspected of committing, permission must be received from a Magistrate to detain them longer. A Magistrate can then give the police permission to detain the suspect for a maximum of 60 hours longer (2 ½ days more), brining the total to 96 hours (4 days).

If the suspect is being detained on suspicion of terrorism, an extension for the detention period can be applied for. A warrant from a magistrate allows for detention of up to 14 days, and a warrant from a senior judge for longer than 14 days, only up to 28 days in total. A suspect that is being held for longer than 96 hours is required and has the right to be visited by a healthcare professional every 24 hours.

All detainees must be told their rights by the police and these are:

  • That they can have someone informed of their arrest.
  • That they are entitled to free legal advice, independent of the police.
  • They can consult privately with a solicitor.
  • They are allowed to view the Police Codes of Practice.
  • Those under 17, handicapped, or mentally ill, can have an appropriate adult other than a solicitor present at the interview.
  • To speak to someone on the telephone (this right is not essential and can be refused).
  • To have ventilated and sufficiently lit accommodation, regular meals, and at least 8 hours of continuous rest in a 24 hour period.

Detainees must also be given a written copy of these rights.

The right to have someone informed of their arrest is made available by s 56 of PACE. The detainee can nominate any one they wish, someone who may take an interest in their welfare, and this should be done as soon as is feasible. If the offence is an indictable offence, the notification can be delayed for up to 36 hours if it might affect the investigation, such as interference with the evidence or witnesses.

Detainees can contact their own solicitor or use the duty solicitor service provided free. The custody officer must ensure the detainee sign if they would like legal advice or not. This right must also be displayed on posters in Police stations.

 

The Police have these powers so that they can check their suspicions without arresting the person.

The Police have the power to stop and search a person only if they have reasonable grounds for suspecting that person of being in the possession of prohibited articles or drugs (on themselves or in their vehicle). Prohibited articles include offensive weapons (this includes knives and other sharp objects), articles for use in burglary, theft or criminal damage.

To protect the public, and prevent the Police from just searching anyone, at anytime, for no reason; the Police officer must give his name, station and reason for the search. If they do not release any of these details, it would be an unlawful search. In the case of Osman v DPP (1999), the police did not give their name or station, so the Queen’s Bench Divisional Court did not find Mr Osman guilty of assaulting the Police on duty because the search was unlawful.

If the search in public, the police can only ask the suspect to remove their outer coat, jacket and gloves. It is a public place if you do not live at that address, so a public place could be a street, car park, or even a garden, if you don’t live there. If a more through search needs to be made, like asking you to remove your shoes or T-Shirt, it must be done out of public view (it can be done in a police van). A written report must be made for all searches.

The Code emphasises that this power must not be used with unlawful discrimination and the power must be used fairly and responsibly. It also mentions that there must be impartial reason for the search and not because of their race, age, or appearance. A suspect can only be stopped on appearance if they are part of a gang that has a distinctive way of showing that they are part of that gang and the police know this from a reliable source.

The police can also stop and search people under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and Terrorism Act 2000. The Terrorism Act 2000 allows the police to ask suspects to remove their headgear and shoes. The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 allows the police to stop and search in anticipation of violence but this can only be authorised by a senior officer and only for a period of 24 hours. During this period, the police do not need to have reasonable suspicion of the people they stop.

The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 allows the police to ask a person to remove anything which they may be using to conceal their identity, like a scarf or anything covering the face.

 

To aid in the investigation of crime, the Police need special powers which will help them in their investigations. Most of the powers the Police have are given by the Police and Criminal Evidence (PACE) Act 1984. Taken from this Act and others, the police have 8 codes of practice from A to H.

Code A: Powers of Stop and Search
Code B: Powers to search premises and seize property
Code C: Detention and questioning of suspects
Code D: Identification procedures
Code E: Tape-recording of interviews with suspects
Code F: Video recording of interviews
Code G: Powers of Arrest
Code H: Detention, treatment, and questioning of terrorism suspects.

The Codes of Practice provide the core framework of police powers and safeguards around stop and search, arrest, detention, investigation, identification and interviewing detainees.

 

Civil cases are usually about disputes between individuals and/or businesses. There are usually other ways of settling an issue without going to court. These are legally called ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Methods.

The methods are:

  • Negotiation:
    This is going to the other party concerned to talk to them about the issue at hand. Discuss you problem with them and see what can be done about it. Negotiation is the best method of resolving a dispute, because no one wants to go to court and this is the cheapest and quickest way.

    An example of negotiation is when you buy something from a shop and you are unhappy with the product, you go back to the shop and talk to them about it. This usually results in you getting you a refund, or the product is replaced with another. This problem would have been solved through negotiation.

    Solicitors can even be used to negotiate on their client’s behalf.

    Advantages:
    * Cheap, relatively free
    * Easy, no form filling, no legal terminology
    * Quick, Can be resolved almost instantaneously

    Disadvantages:
    * Award may not be as high as in court, getting compensation of a larger amount as opposed
    to getting only a refund.
    * May not be fair and one party may in one way or the other be deceived.

  • Mediation:
    This is when there is a neutral third party acting as a facilitator, to consult with and covey messages and opinions of the two arguing parties. A mediator does not make any suggestions and takes a role that is no more active than conveying messages.

    The Centre for Dispute Resolution, which was set up in London in 1991, is an example of a commercial mediation service.
    Advantages:
    The two arguing parties are in control, a solution reached through mediation is done with
    no help form the mediator and  is a solution agreed on by the arguing parties. They make the decisions.
    Disadvantages:
    If the parties cannot cooperate and compromise, they may not be able to come to a solution. The mediator cannot make any input.

  • Conciliation:
    This is a mediator who takes a more active role in the dispute, by making suggestions and giving their opinions on what should be done and how it can be resolved.
  • Arbitration:
    This is when the parties agree to submit their claim to private arbitration. Private arbitration is governed by the Arbitration Act 1996. The parties can choose the number of arbitrators. If they are unable to agree, the Act provides that there should be one. The procedure is also decided by the parties.

    Advantages:
    1. The Parties can choose their own arbitrator, they can choose a lawyer, technical expert or
    professional arbitrator.
    2. The hearing time and place can be arranged to suit parties.
    3. The arbitration procedure is flexible and decided on by the parties. Usually more relaxed
    than in court.
    4. The dispute is dealt with privately, so there is no publicity or media coverage.
    5. Can be resolved quicker than in court.
    6. Costs are less than if going to court.
    7. The award is final and can be enforced by the courts.

    Disadvantages
    1. An unexpected legal point may come up which should not really be decided by a non-
    lawyer arbitrator.
    2. If a professional arbitrator is used, the fees may be expensive, may not be as much as
    going to court, but still expensive.
    3. The rights of appeal are limited, should a party not be happy with the decision.
    4. Commercial and International arbitration sometimes takes as long as the Court process.

When making a claim, a track system is used; this is just the procedure which the claim follows. This is dependant on how much the claim is for and what the claim is for (why the claim is being made). There are three tracks, which are:

  • The small claims track:
    This is for claims under £5000, except for personal injury and housing claims, where the limit is £1000. These trials are held in the County Courts and tried by a District Judge, a solicitor is optional.

    Advantages:
    1. The cost of the proceedings is low, especially for cases under £1000.
    2. If you do not win the case, you do not have to pay the opposition’s costs (e.g. The
    winner’s lawyer fees.)
    3. A lawyer is not required; you can present your case yourself.
    4. The procedure is quicker than for other cases, so is over sooner.
    5. The District Judge should help the parties explain their case.
     Disadvantages:
    1. An allocation fee of £100 has to be paid for cases over £1000.
    2. Legal funding is not made available in this type of cases, as is done in other cases,
    especially criminal cases.
    3. If one side uses a lawyer and the claimant does not, this will put the claimant at a
    disadvantage.
    4. Even if the case is won, the claimant may not always receive all of the money the court said they should receive. Only about 60% of successful claimants actually received all of the money.
    The fast track:
    This is for claims in between £5000 and £15 000. For personal injury and housing claims under £50 000. This can be heard by the High Court or the County Courts.

  • The multi track:
    This is for claims over £15 000 or really complex cases of any amount. For personal injury and housing claims more than £50 000. This can be heard by the High Court or the County Courts.

The small claims and fast track were designed to deal with cases quickly and so the trial only lasts a day. The trial date is set within 30 weeks, which is relatively short when compared to the average waiting time of 85 weeks prior to the three track system; six months less.

The three track system was suggested by Lord Woolf in his Access to Justice Report.

 

Organisational charts shows the hierarchy of the business, who is in charge and how the people within the business relate to each other.

It shows those in authority, their span of control, who is responsible for who, and interdepartmental (between departments) communication.

Advantages:

  • The formal relationships between people and departments in an organisation can be highlighted.
  • They are useful source of information for new employees to know where they are and where others are in relation to them.

Disadvantages:

  • They are static, and the organisation structure is likely to change regularly.
  • They do not show informal relations between departments.

Leadership Styles

There are many different styles of leadership, most of them can be categorised into one of the following groups:

  • Authoritarian (Autocratic)
    • The leader makes all the decisions
    • Others are told what to do
    • Everything is closely monitored and watched
    • Paternalistic
      • Means Father-like
      • The leader tries to do what is best for their workers
      • The leader might consult before making decision when and as appropriate but still decides what will be done.
      • Democratic
        • Decisions are made by the people.
        • Participation, worker involvement is decision making.
        • Laissez-faire
          • Means ‘Let-it-be’ (French)
          • Employees are left to do what they want
          • They are perceived as professionals who will get on with their work and do it well.

© 2012 Obolynx Educator Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha